Anon #268
"Everyone said the tigers wouldn't win a game, they have 2 already and if they get 4-6 for the year then they have done well ".
I'm pretty sure down at tiger land they were being quoted as saying that they would be top 4 potential.
If that was Southerns thought process prior to the season starting, wouldn't that indicate that they don't think there is a problem with their list, therefore they wouldn't be doing anything substantial to build their list.
Compare the current squad to last years... If southern could have kept their core group of players, by appointing a more liked coach, they prob would have been playing finals ball.
Instead the juniors that were forging their new senior program have left to other clubs due to 1 coaching appointment that was made against the players advice, now Southern have to start the process again. Except they have no real talent, with the only players showing any ability being their point and centre, but still they wouldn't crack a starting 5 of any other side. After those two, the rest are below average D3 players, and that squad wouldn't even compete for a D3 title.
I'm sick of the sob stories of clubs complaining about "too many teams", "too many restricted players" etc etc. If Southern appointed a liked coach, their core group stays, they play finals ball, and they attract potential players from other clubs.
Instead they finish 8th, attract no players from other clubs or restricted players, and continue in the bomb shelter that they have built for themselves.
And I would just like to add, that this is not a shot at Leigh from me at all, it is simply the fact that the girls that left, left because of the appointment which is a fact.