Nick,
20.4ppg on 41%FG and 30% 3PT is not good in terms of efficiency.
Exciting on offence? More than 33% of the shots Willie puts up are 3 point attempts. This from a guy shooting 30% beyond the arc this season. Phil's system relies on a motion offence where the ball is meant to move quickly. Instead Farley predictably crosses the ball over 3 or 4 times without purpose before trying to go left every time, otherwise forcing up a miss going right or a pass under pressure to a team-mate with the clock running down. Why not catch and try using his first step to get in the lane attacking defender's high foot for once? This predictable routine is just one facet in which Farley shows his mental softness.
"Not only that but Willie's has reasonable defence"
So please explain what you are seeing that I don't. I just described his defensive liabilities, which are plain to see for anyone who has ever played the game at any level and for many who haven't either. Always goes under screens no matter how hot a 3 point shooter is (Cortez and Saville 38 and 36 when Saville was having a terrible season). Waves his hands frantically but always has terrible position one on one and refuses to move laterally with his opponent. John Rillie in his peak never got a Boomers gig in his prime due to his poor lateral movement and meanwhile the current national coach is talking of our defensive liabilities in our top line Australian talent compared to European opponents so why would anyone put Farley in who is one of the worst defensive players in the league even by the NBL's low defensive standards.
As I mentioned above, his rotation is non existent, when his man gets on his hip he stops, doesn't recover, doesn't get into defensive rebounding position or leak for a fast-break and won't hustle for a loose ball when it comes near.
How about this Nick, I'll stop giving him shit if you give me anything to refute my claims about him.