For crying out loud, look at the rot set in. I'd be interested in the ages of some of you people.
It's a sad day when the 3, who I consider the most knowledgable, contributers to this forum bring out the long knives and differ so strongly in their opinions.
Statman, Yogee, Isaac... what is going on here?
'Fairweather fans' alot of you are. Totally with you on that Yogee!
'All we want to see is OUR team putting their best foot forward EVERY game and doing their best. At the moment we dont see that and so we are all voicing our frustrations.'
Agree with you there Statman.
'It's natural for everyone to discuss the highlights after a win and the lowlights after a loss.'
And agree with you too Isaac.
But...
Have to give the kudos to Yogee for telling it how it is!
I expected a more intelligent response from you Isaac - 'All the "true fans" and "fairweather fans" stuff is bullshit.'
Brockman and Statman, would to hear more on what you think here.
Not that it matters that much but alot of the comments above are 'anon', and ironically the majority of these are the 'fair weather' fans, not knowledgable in their posts. To start with, the opening 'anon' states -
'Good marketing tool getting a 'face' such as phil smyth's in the franchise, but wow he has gone down hill since those chmapionships. Not a good teacher, just a good coach when the team has already been put together, eg champs of '98'.
What a load of crap!
The 'team' of 98 -
Kevin Brooks, Brett Maher, Martin Cattalini, Darnell Mee, John Rillie, Mark Davis, Paul Rees, Rupert Sapwell, Scott Ninnis, Dean Brogan, Paul Bauer, Jason Williams.
Taking into account the age and experience of each player, how can you say this team is by far better than the team now?
Hopefully someone later will ask the questions of what I mean because I don't want to make this post more of an essay than it already is.
(before you do, check out the team stats in the links to the left).
The Championship team of 01/02 -
Willie Farley, Brett Maher, David Stiff, Paul Rees, Matt Garrison, Rupert Sapwell, Mark Nash, Jason Williams, Matt Illman, Jacob Holmes, Oscar Forman, Blake Truslove.
Again, a Championship won, but how is this team better than the current, or the team of '98'?
On paper the 98 team LOOKS a standout doesn't it? On paper the team of 01/02 doesn't, does it? What about this season's team compared to them?
With stats compared the same results are being produced.. but the opposition has got better.
Why did we win championships in the aforementioned years?
Going even further back, on paper the teams of earlier are more talent laden, but why did they fail?
In my opinion it is the coaching staff that has brought the 36ers success... that and team morale. Basketball is not a sport where you bring out the guns to blow the opponent away, it's also tactics/strategy that plays a major role.
Since the first trophy in the 80's Adelaide has always been a doughnut team, more the case in each championship won with Smyth/Breheny. We run/gun and utilise tactics/strategy to beat an opponent. Who makes these strategies?
Adelaide has in the past 5 seasons always been a 'dark horse', thanks to the coaching staff. I've never liked Dave Thomas and thought it was a dark period in the history when he played; when we lost Mee. But we still contended the 'top' teams. Eveyone says that the 01/02 trophy was 'unexpected' or 'unbelievable'... how did we win it against more talent laden teams on PAPER? The coaching staff!
Again, Adelaide is a 'dark horse'. Close wins, big losses, 'unexpected' results. I believe Adelaide is the only team capable of pulling off an 'upset' over the Kings or Tigers who everyone thinks will win it. How they may do it depends on how the coaching staff put together a strategy to utilise the weapons we have to use.
Yes, the last few games have been abysmal and huge losses going into the 'play offs' is not a good thought. But do these results really matter? Key players haven't played, ladder positions have been consolidated, other teams have done the same thing! Bruton/Smith/Calvary/Saville/Ballinger all didn't play in last rounds. Were they injured or were they rested? If you say they were injured then take into account the actual minutes they played in their final games.
I agree that a team should come out and play their hardest to try and get a win... in a perfect world.
'As I said a couple of weeks ago, that is JUST the type of effort that you want from a team in financial trouble.'
Well said Mutley (#68597), but is anyone going to care about this result if the Sixers win the next game... the game that counts?
What better way to drum up support by going as far into the finals as you can.
As Yogee said 'TRUE fans stick with the team through thick and thin.'
All the people posting should be SUPPORTING their team, not stabbing them in the back! The season is not over yet, the Finals are a different ball game, focus on how we can win the elimination game and proceed instead of sounding the death knell.
SUPPORT YOUR TEAM!
If the Sixer's need changes in players/staff, then wait for the END of the season - how many changes will you want to make if we go all the way?