Would suggest it shouldn't be once off, but a consistent starting five during the whole season, with a player off the bench filling in where needed.
And also be consistent with eras. The old NBA goat arguments about Jordan playing against plumbers vs LeBron. Early days of the league did have few professionals, even the imports had to get jobs to supplement their income, so similar to what nbl1 is like in most of its conferences these days.
So teams like the 79 St Kilda Saints despite having a few Australian legends would be beaten by teams in initial post.
So statistically the 88 cats would be a prime candidate being winless.
Another thing being a factor would be coaching and getting the best out of the team. Recent one is SEM this season, looked terrible and winless, sack the coach and make finals. On paper would say no-one gave Tassie a chance in first couple of years, grand finals and a title makes up for talent.
Could have a most talented individual 5 that were terrible as a team, some recent sixer teams could be candidates.
So maybe worst team this century. Just saw the Hunter Pirates from 03 04 with the record 2-31. Can't even remember KB being in this team, so his inclusion shows how bad they were.
Kevin Brooks: Small forward, played all 33 games during the season.
Geordie Cullen: Center, logged significant minutes and was named the team's Most Improved Player for the season.
Brendan Mann: Team captain and point guard.
Jason Morgan: Guard/forward.
Cameron Harriman: Forward.