If history has shown us anything it's that you can never predict who will or wont suit up for a Boomers team. For the past decade we've had 4-5 consistent names, one fell in a shower, and now the current Boomers have to completely alter their plans moving forward. No doubt similar issues will pop up for future players.
Anyway, have the Boomers peaked? Well.. is an appropriate answer "who friggen knows?"
I think this current team still has a mission ahead and I am more invested in how they figure out overcoming adversity than I am with what may or may not be beyond that. I agree with PerthWorld in that the Olympics come but 2 weeks out of every four years. We're in the middle of one now. We've got (still) a very good team with (still) reasonable medal hopes. That's where my concern is. If we've peaked yet will come down to how that ends. And we should know in about 8 days how that story has unfolded.
As for the future, it has the potential to be bright. Doesn't mean it will be. Doesn't mean all those players don't take themselves to the Ben Simmons school of Boomers inconsistency. Doesn't mean we don't bring a profoundly talented team to those games and fail to achieve anything, or fail to even qualify as Canada has shown us all.
What I think we will likely lack moving forward is a consistent core with a consistent identity. It wouldn't surprise me to see Mills, Ingles, and possibly even Baynes and Delly have another go around as supporting players so that there is some remnant of the hard-earned Boomers culture still around for the next Olympic cycle. I think consistency and culture mean more than what hypothetical names may or may not make themselves available.
Anyway, in short, who knows. There's potential and that's the only thing we can say. We've taken a knock in our current campaign but the chance for us to peak this current week still exists. I am 100 percent ALL IN on that.