#122 - Isn't the fact they are willing to spend money a good thing if they are aspiring to go up. And why should the mens position mid-table be the only reason Casey are admitted. Their Womens team is doing quite well. the 4 Associations that went over from Big V originally, did they occupy the top 4 spots in both Mens and Women's before they left Big V ?
The Mens teams were near the top, but Ringwood were 6th in the women, and Eltham were 10th.
So Casey Mens being Mid-table half way through a season, as a reason for them not being accepted, is dumb.
Regarding the nepotism mentioned in the management, I can't disagree. I think Casey was going to be big no matter who was there, as mentioned. But that adds weight to the argument that the club should be accepted based on the strength of their Association, not because you have some sort of personal issue with who is running the place.
If you're going to deny a club entry into a competition for the poor management, or the nepotism in appointments, most clubs in Victoria would struggle to be allowed in any comps. Couple of posts above people are saying how 'mismanaged' Hawthorn are. The trouble at Frankston over the last few years ? Scan the historical posts on Hoops and you'll see most clubs have had someone come on here and complain about their management. Maybe we should deny them entry into NBL1 too.
Fact is, they (probably along with Wyndham, although Junior comparison probably falls in favour of Casey at the moment), are the best placed programs to be accepted into NBL1, in Victoria. They tick more boxes than the other clubs mentioned. Whether you like them, their management or their mens team, or not.