The big names renogitiate and the rest will be pulleded back under the guise of austerity measures. Was this what the NBLPA had in mind?
You seem to want to blame someone.
Can you accept that at the time of these negotiations the world was in turmoil.
Nothing was certain, only more uncertainty. There was no precedent for this so everyone is going by gut and what is 'logical and reasonable'.
At that time, it would be foreseeable that the league would suffer a significant drop in revenue for the net season (if it happened at all).
May businesses would not be able to survive such a hit, and the NBL and its teams are no different, so the reduction in the teams biggest expense was top of the pile to be reviewed. People were thinking worst case scenarios at the time, a sharing the pain plan was devised.
If it makes you feel better the NBLPA took care of the lower tier players by tiering / lowering their reductions.
The Cottons, Wares, Kays, Cooks and Hodgsons (LOL) took the biggest hits.
Aren't they allowed to respond and find a better deal?
As the NBLPA did not have visibility of what the world was like in 3, 6 - 12 months I think they did a reasonable job negotiating what they did.
To go back in hindsight and poke holes seems rather silly to me.