Another campaign, and another Boomers fourth place finish. Fourth, being perhaps the worst possible place you could find yourself. You were good enough to be a problem to other teams, but not good enough for any kind of reward for which history will remember you.
It is sad for these players first and foremost. Very, very sad. But for their last minutes of execution, they just didn't end up actually deserving it. The team that played to win and came up big when it counted won the game, and Australia, as has been the trend for our entire basketball history, was found lacking.
You have to wonder whether the ghosts of fourth-placed past started attacking them mentally over the past few games. Whether they couldn't mentally even conceive of actually winning these games so they acted in ways that caused that to be the case. I can't think of any other explanation for the complete and utter capitulations we have witnessed across the past two games. You also have to wonder whether these guys will put their hand up for another serving of heartbreak in Tokyo and moving ahead into the future.
The sad thing is, this team does stand among our greatest. Our greatest teams are excellent teams renowned for choking when it matters most. As much as I love the Boomers, that is what they are historically. Maybe that is why the media just doesn't care? Maybe that's why the public scoff? We've always proven to be good, but just not good enough. We're not quite "also-rans" but we are a team that the best teams in the world know they can beat as soon as they smell blood in the water.
Fact is we are 90 percent the way of being a medalling team, but that 10 percent is a real problem that needs figuring out.
Was it the coaching? Team selections? Talent level? Mental issues?
The first thing that bounces out to me about coaching is the execution. We were an unselfish team that never managed to keep turnovers under control. And in those last minutes of both games, we looked absolutely clueless about what to do, what to run, who to get the ball to, or how to manufacture a shot. Patty bailed us out of situations all too often.
Team selection. Looking at your team selection you have a 9 man rotation where there is no meaningful rest for guards. While I don't think you just stack in whoever you want at any position just for talent, I do believe that if you couldn't trust Gliddon, Sobey or Barlow to even average 5 minutes a game between them, then you made the wrong decisions on who you picked. Barlow was a last minute call in for Bolden, so that is understandable. But are you telling me we couldn't have possibly got more out of either Lisch or Martin at guard? If only for experience sake, Lisch over Sobey if you REALLY cannot trust to give Sobey a minute. Tired legs and rotations was a factor in falling apart.
Then there's the talent. We have a talented team. But are they the top 3 most talented team in the tournament? No. I suppose we were hoping this vaunted structure would be the thing that made us shine through. But I am not of the belief that we can get any further with Matthew Dellavedova as a starting point guard. He is an excellent back up at this level but we need more at that spot. Joe Ingles fell away in the second half and yuou have to wonder what is going on with him mentally for him to have shot the way he has in the tournament. Jock Landale was near useless in the tournament. Nick Kay was the surprise package who puts himself into serious Tokyo contention for being the best garbage man you could ask for. But for the most part, I'd argue that the talent we have lacks the nerve in big games. Maybe the Europeans are better because they have more big game experience. But there is a need to add pieces around the talent we have, for sure. The core is good, but they're not going to get it done consistently enough to medal in these tournaments.