Southern Joe
Years ago
Was is it correct?
I'm not talking about whether it was a flop or not.
Did TG get a previous flop warning? If yes.. then they had every right to T him if they believed what he did was a flop.
If no.. it should have only been a warning. His other T was not for anything to do with a flop.
I believe there was a flop warning called before that which covers both teams not just a player so the tech was tge correct call
Each team get's a flop warning. It's not one warning for both.
NJS
Years ago
I wish we had 'Kestleman Cam' during moments like these
FM
Years ago
That one poor call really opened an ugly 2 minutes of Basketball and an extremely poorly managed game.
20 years in the league and still no feel for the game. Maybe Scott needs to follow Brad and say goodbye.
He had a previous tech. The second Tech for flopping was the correct call.
Southern Joe
Years ago
He had a previous tech. The second Tech for flopping was the correct call.
But the 1st tech was completely unrelated to flops. If that was the basis of tech for flopping it should be incorrect.
If TG had been warned for flopping .. or the rules say ANYBODY being warned means next flop warning is a T.. THEN the 2nd tech is correct... not becuase of the unrelated 1st T.
He got T'd for pushing into the taipans huddle to mouth off. 2nd Tech was because he flopped 1st q n got the warning. He did it a 2ndvtime n got pinged. No ones fault but his own.
He is just so pissed off - who can blame him but doubt he gets a contract next season if this is what hapoens
"20 years in the league and still no feel for the game. Maybe Scott needs to blow Brad and say goodbye."
You need to be a registered user to post from this location. Register here.
Advertise on Hoops to a very focused, local and sports-keen audience. Email for rates and options.
An Australian basketball forum covering NBL, WNBL, ABL, Juniors plus NBA, WNBA, NZ, Europe, etc | Forum time is: 2:09 am, Mon 10 Feb 2025 | Posts: 968,026 | Last 7 days: 754
