![](/images/avatar-40.png)
Anonymous
Years ago
SEABL, BA & BIG V
I was reading the announcement about the Melbourne Tigers joining SEABL and it raised an eyebrow or two.
Was i reading the article right? Is SEABL now being administered by BA? If so isn't this a conflict in BA's obligations to other competitions and leagues especially other state based competitions across Australia?
In the article it was announced that the Tigers women's team would also be moving to SEABL in 2017, while at the same time on the BIG V website it seemed BIG V were using the Women staying as a positive?
Considering Sandringham, Dandneong and now Melbourne have simply used the BIG V competition as a stepping stone into SEABL, how is this a positive? Especially considering the Melbourne Women's team is now on the move in 12 months time.
How long before Knox does the same.
This leads me to one question. Is the BIG V administration asleep at the wheel?
If I was running BIG V, Melbourne Women's team would be out the door, and I would be seeking significant assurances from Knox before admitting them to BIG V competitions.
Surely BIG V should be supporting it's dedicated and loyal clubs, rather than allowing bigger clubs to use and abuse their competitions and those same loyal and dedicated clubs?