"The marquee player still counts against the cap for $150k (IIRC)."

Sort of. If they are using the marquee rule, they can spend $850k on nine players, and whatever amount they want on the marquee. There is meant to be some sort of luxury tax on what they spend above the normal $1mill mark but I don't know if that has been clearly defined.

So if they haven't used their marquee signing, the salary cap is not stopping them from doing so. I'd say there are other financial reasons for them going budget for their second import.

Reply #540938 | Report this post

Anonymous
Years ago

Hearing whispers around town they have signed Al Harrington

Reply #540940 | Report this post

Supernintendo Chalmers
Years ago

Whispers around town or voices in your head?

Reply #540943 | Report this post

Anonymous
Years ago

Its what I'm hearing, adding fuel to the fire is the fact that Harrington has two new twitter followers close to Wollongong

Reply #540945 | Report this post

koberulz
Years ago

^doesn't that defeat the purpose of the marquee player rule???

The marquee player should be exempt from the salary cap.

No, because you can still pay them, theoretically at least, millions. If it didn't count against the cap at all, teams using the marquee rule basically just get a free player.

So if they haven't used their marquee signing, the salary cap is not stopping them from doing so.

It is if they've already spent $850,001.

Reply #540950 | Report this post

Anonymous
Years ago

FFS!

Reply #540952 | Report this post

You need to be a registered user to post from this location. Register here.

Close ads

Serio: Tourism photography and videography

Little Streaks - The fun and interactive good-habits app designed especially for kids.

Advertise on Hoops to a very focused, local and sports-keen audience. Email for rates and options.

Hoops

Can the Hawks fit an import under the points cap?

Recent Posts