MACDUB, I think 'pace and space' is the phrase of choice for media cliche at the moment. But the why of it isn't as simple as 'that's the best way to win.' How many 'traditional centres' have come into the league in recent years with anything like the talent or skill level of the guards that are currently dominant? Yes, Tim Duncan's a 'power forward' but how far away is he from the traditional centre? Didn't the Spurs win a title with him and Tiago Splitter, neither of whom fits the stretch-4/mobile-big mould just a year ago?
I think teams are getting smarter about working to the strengths of their best players, and it happens that back-to-the-basket post-play is a strength of very few players in the league right now. And where it is a strength, they're just not very good players (think Jared Sullinger). I think the playoffs over the last few years have made clear that you must be able to space the floor, but it doesn't have to be 5-out. Duke won a national title because putting shooters of the calibre of Cook, Allen, Jones, Jones and Winslow around an Okafor post-up means you're going to score extremely efficiently, whether it's from 2's or 3's. 3's are great, but with the league average at about 35%, they're worth approx. 1.05 points per possession. An Okafor post-up, when he's finishing them at 70%, is worth 1.4. That's on par with a Steph Curry 3.
Such a big deal has been made of Towns being a complete player who can score inside and out but his post moves are rubbish - that's why he'll end up playing in the mid-range. He scored 25 against a Notre Dame team that guarded him with 6'8" Zach Auguste and 6'5" Pat Connaughton. That's where Okafor is the best test of the traditional centre probably since Dwight Howard came into the league. If he can be a respectable defender and free throw shooter (both massive 'ifs'), he'll be an All-Star. It's just a shame he's playing in Philly.