There is often criticism of pool seedings and after the even we can look at how the teams faired in line with their seedings. Just looking at the Boys State, the following can said:
(Team; Ave seeding; Actual Result; Difference)
Norwood: 6.0, 4.5, +1.5 better than seeding
Southern: 5.8, 4.3, +1.5
West: 7.5, 7.0, 0.5
Centrals: 5.5, 5.2, 0.3
North: 7.2, 7.5, -0.3
Woodville: 5.0, 5.3, -0.3
South: 5.5, 6.0, -0.5
Forestville: 5.0, 5.8, -0.8
Mavs: 5.0, 6.0, -1.0
Sturt: 1.25, 2.5, -1.25
Norwood and Southern punching over their weight, Sturt and Mavs under performed against seeding.
I would argue if a team is +/- a position, the seeding was accurate.
Looking at the State Boys, Norwood would be happy with U12B (+3 spots), and U16B (+4 spots) Southern should be happy with U12B (+3 spots), U14B (+2) and U18B (+2). West should be happy with U18B (+3). North happy with U12B (+2) but sad with U18B (-3). Woodville happy with U12B (+2), sad with U18 (-3) Forestville sad with U12B(-3) Sturt U12B (-3)