![](https://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=c9db016ede8d535c400bb6d5234dce7f&default=https%3A%2F%2F
www.hoops.com.au%2Fimages%2Favatar-40.png)
Isaac
Years ago
Is the NBL minimum player salary too high?
A friend of mine closely involved in the league makes the argument that the minimum player salary in the NBL is too high. I don't know the exact number these days - $37k or so?
Their argument goes that the final roster positions (9th, 10th, 11th men) don't usually have as much of an impact on the team, yet their wage compares favourably with the guy one step up the pecking order who might play decent minutes for a real impact.
Let's say that Pero Vasiljevic (3.9 MPG) or Luke Martin (7.5 MPG) or Dan Jackson (10.4 MPG) get that minimum for very limited minutes while other players get potentially 20-30% more in salary for 2-3 times the impact.
Could a reduced wage for the cheapest player and an understanding that they won't always be able to make every training due to part-time work commitments (or even work within the club) either allow for more money to be channeled towards showcase players or reduce the costs slightly for owners?
Obviously clubs would still have the option to pay players more than the minimum if they could and might be involved in helping find part-time work with sponsors and adjusting training schedules where appropriate.
Surely there is a middle ground between what we have now and the occasional call for a return to a semi-pro league?