ok, as we discussed earlier this is one option that the clubs could have pursued.
A no confidence motion can be passed on a simple majority - i cannot recall from the constitution if a more decisive motion, such as a motion to bring forward the AGM or cause a spill, required a certain percentage to get up.
Two things should happen:
- the board, or at least some of the board, should demonstrate their understanding of the members position by resigning - this would create casual vacancies to be filled. At the least the President should formally offer their resignation to the Board at the next meeting.
- the voting members should (could) pursue more aggressive action
The CEO might, morally, consider resigning.
The concern is that the junior clubs do think they know what they are doing. It is my experience in basketball that junior clubs do have a reasonably myopic view of what it takes to run an association. I have seen many "junior" officials grow up into "association" officials and very quickly change their mindset.
With respect to Red88, who shows that (apologies but i am calling out by way of example not to ridicule) he is there for "all our kids". That comment does not reflect the interests of thousands of senior (recreational) basketballers at Knox and perhaps neglects the representative and social outcomes the Association should be providing.