Anon 370316 Assume you are talking about the Boys?
Were you there at the Championships? I don't know where you get your observations from. If the SA & NSW Metro teams skills were better than Vic Metro, then surely one (if not both) of these teams should have played off in the final??
As for the shooting %, check the website, Vic Metro boys had the best TFG shooting % (followed by NZ, who were a good team). Maybe that is why they won??
Wonder why Q-South made the final, their TFG shooting % was about the 6th best for the tournament and their 3P% & FT% was not great either? While good shooting helps, it's not all about the shooting, defence is an important part as well as "taking on" the game.
U16 Boys - Shooting %
TFG% 3P% FT%
ACT 28.25 11.68 49.41
New Zealand 43.46 11.99 56.56
Northern Territory 24.81 9.08 55.64
NSW Country 31.71 20.5 46.18
NSW Metro 35.71 16.14 54.04
Queensland North 34.2 10.94 62.3
Queensland South 37.4 17.5 50.59
SA Country 32.81 19.03 50.95
SA Metro 39.4 23.86 61.01
Tasmania 36.27 11.4 53.36
Vic Country 40.87 17.4 60.17
Vic Metro 46.74 12.23 56.06
WA Country 22.59 10.73 50.76
Wa Metro 38.14 26.03 56.98
Sounds like sour grapes to me. The vics have a huge talent pool, so you would expect them to be better, except for NSW. I think you should just applaud the Vics Development Program. To me it looks like it has been working well and has been for a long time.