Competitions Committee are useless and make up the rules as they please depending on who they like or dislike.

I suspect the ppl who can really answer this are currently celebrating another win atm.

North (Pero) did not want him as he said it like it was and so agreed on a clearance to where ever,( why you would not want a player who was leading the scoring after 2 games to stay ?????,) maybe not enough room for two stars in one team.....

like everything many different sides to this story.
But the bottom line is BasketballSA and the competition committee have screwed over 8 other clubs who did not have a say in this mid season transfer.
Start the season on one set of rules then anyone with a biggest enough sob story gets to play by their own rules. Sturt would be pissed because they wanted to play by their own rules and got rejected(wanting two imports for womens team) Forestville tried to play by their own rules(Carla Borrego)but was slapped. Now that poor eastern bottom of the food chain gets to take a reject from Nth Adelaide alls good for the rules to change because its good for basketball(insert sarcasm). Who cares if North agreed to this- this was a deccison that affected 8 other clubs.
Paul Arnott and his competition committe are a effing joke.

Seems to me the competition committee did the right thing for the individual as well as Eastern. It is halfway through the season and no club is disadvantaged given the number if times they play Eastern with or without Ed

And at 0-9 hardly going to make finals. My understanding is that all members of the competition agreed to the exemption to allow a person to play. I say well done to Paul and the committee to consider everything and make the right decision

You quote the Carla situation. Perhaps bring open and honest up front does count for something when trying to get a favorable response rather than being devious

"North (Pero) didn't want him" - I hear it a little different. Like Millard was offered the world and got delivered Jack.

Every team in the league has to play Eastern again. If your good enough for finals and deserve to be there it will take care of itself.

Above anon - exactly. If one player to a team who hasnt won a game to a team not making the finals the you don't deserve to be there. To the anon above that you are so wrong

Thanks for the feedback competition committee. So if you honestly want to break the rules you apply for an exemption, jez!!!!!!! Unanimous or not doesn't make this exemption right. Just because every team gets to play them once more, makes it fair to all. Crap! Agreed if you’re good enough you should make it anyway BUT that is not the point. This is our top league for our state and we are treating it like junior basketball
The point is we all started the season on one set of rules and you have changed them halfway through the season. Not to mention a blatant disregard of the 60 day rule that the CABL currently play under.
It’s because of decisions made like this that BasketballSA and the competition committee are considered a joke and no-one will co-operate with them to improve basketball in this state

RE...
Reply #366474
Thanks for the feedback competition committee. So if you honestly want to break the rules you apply for an exemption, jez!!!!!!! Unanimous or not doesn't make this exemption right.

It sounds like you are the only one with the problem if all the other clubs agreed well so be it. As the member clubs have a say and vote in most of the rules... If you are that UPSET and want to have a CRY do waste you time here go for a drive down there tomorrow and have your say,

You idiot- Unanimous is the vote by the competition committee, not clubs- they didnt have a vote

QQ

Those are only 3 reasons. There can be and are more

Anon 473 - No I'm not.
Who would you believe? Pero?

Anon 525 - you are soooo wrong.