skull
Years ago
gasol had a fair bit of forward momentum....he didnt really take the charge!
brutal dunk!
XY
Years ago
Neither are fouls. Both are within the no charge zone.
except for the fact he pushes Gasols shouler down to help himself launch even higher.. not that he needed too
great vision, amazing athletic ability
Is throwing your forearm into a defenders face a foul? I don't know the exact rule, but I'd think it would be.
Kobe24
Years ago
Second one is a definite foul on Griffin, offensive fend off. Its obvious. BUT being the NBA, if the Reign man can take 3 steps to throw down in the 90's, why not let Griffin do his thing through a defender in the 2010's?
joshuapending
Years ago
Kemp was cool though, to me Griffin seems to be a bit of a punk.
Outsider
Years ago
In the second video, if you look who first made illegal contact, it was Gasol. He puts his arms straight out hitting Griffin, which in my opinion, forces blake to use his arm.
Regardless of who made the contact, the NBA is an entertainment league, where is the entertainment if they call a foul on Blake?
KingJames
Years ago
Much better dunks then Griffin's ring tap throw in dunk that everyone went crazy about.
"Kemp was cool though, to me Griffin seems to be a bit of a punk."
Yes I am sure Alton Lister thought he was cool :)
JOaRiDrAN
Years ago
Kemp was way cooler, Griffin will give us plenty of highlights over the next 5 years
alolymous
Years ago
first time ive seen that kemp footage, dunk is huge.
Ohh and both griffin dunks where fouls.
athlete
Years ago
Neither dunks are fouls, there are countless nba dunks on youtube that are so similar, especially to the first one, have to be consistent (what happens when you don't box out Gasol). On the 2nd one the forearm is nulled because Gasol jumps from the no-charge line and forward(thus out of his cylinder) into Griffin's body after he's already left the ground, making it an instant Gasol foul.
You need to be a registered user to post from this location. Register here.
Advertise on Hoops to a very focused, local and sports-keen audience. Email for rates and options.
Recent Posts
- Updated every 15 minutes
-
KET,
Tue 5:09 - re: the jury is in -
Knockdown3,
Mon 23:44 - re: the jury is in -
The Phantom ,
Mon 22:58 - re: the jury is in -
The Phantom ,
Mon 22:58 - re: the jury is in -
LV,
Mon 22:53 - re: the jury is in -
LV,
Mon 22:35 - re: the jury is in -
LV,
Mon 22:30 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Reggie,
Mon 22:29 - re: the jury is in -
LV,
Mon 22:15 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
KL,
Mon 21:07 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Luuuc,
Mon 20:56 - re: the jury is in -
Beantown,
Mon 20:50 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Beantown,
Mon 20:37 - re: the jury is in -
Ben,
Mon 20:26 - re: the jury is in -
EssenX,
Mon 20:11 - re: the jury is in -
retired,
Mon 19:42 - re: the jury is in -
Dunkman,
Mon 19:34 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
retired,
Mon 19:34 - re: NBL1 East 2025 -
Dunkman,
Mon 19:32 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Anonymightymous...,
Mon 19:29 - re: the jury is in -
Dunkman,
Mon 19:27 - re: the jury is in -
Scout,
Mon 19:24 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
AusLoco,
Mon 19:23 - re: the jury is in -
The Phantom ,
Mon 19:19 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
KET,
Mon 19:02 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Rhino,
Mon 18:57 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Uncle Phil,
Mon 18:56 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
KET,
Mon 18:55 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Mon 18:54 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Rhino,
Mon 18:51 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Rhino,
Mon 18:37 - re: the jury is in -
LV,
Mon 18:35 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Mon 18:34 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
The Phantom ,
Mon 18:34 - re: the jury is in -
Uncle Phil,
Mon 18:27 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Mon 18:24 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Anon,
Mon 18:04 - re: the jury is in -
KET,
Mon 17:55 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Rhino,
Mon 17:52 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Master Chief,
Mon 17:46 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
KL,
Mon 17:14 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
KET,
Mon 17:13 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Rhino,
Mon 17:06 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Peter,
Mon 16:55 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Zodiac,
Mon 16:48 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Rhino,
Mon 16:35 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Knockdown3,
Mon 16:23 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24 -
Knockdown3,
Mon 16:20 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
KET,
Mon 16:01 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Zodiac,
Mon 13:37 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24
An Australian basketball forum covering NBL, WNBL, ABL, Juniors plus NBA, WNBA, NZ, Europe, etc | Forum time is: 6:14 am, Tue 26 Nov 2024 | Posts: 968,026 | Last 7 days: 754