Winitinaminute
Years ago

Clarke planning ahead for 2011/12 season

It looks like Clarke is going to make changes for next season,imports will go,so hes lookin for an australian point Guard,american centre and possibly a small forward?I dont think ballinger be staying,almost same lineup?be interesting off season ,bit of improvement this year(not on the road though)we lack height this year.who doyou think will stay and go,your thoughts.

Topic #24954 | Report this topic


Jonno  
Years ago

Yea we definatly need a new starting centre (some interior defence and rebounding) and a good 3 pt shooter,

i dont think we will get a much better aussie pg line up than Bruce, Carter, Daly, as i doubt we will be able to get Martin or Gibson, possibly Markovich would be worth a crack but is he that much better than a Bruce?

Given the lack of top quality imports not only in the 36ers but in the league, would we be better giving 1 import salary to Schenscher and say 50-65% of an import salary to Magden, and sign 2 good Aussies and either a cheap import or top up another salary and get a better Aussie player instead of a Dowdell, Holmes or Hill. I think Magden would be better than Howard and Schenscher though totally different to Shannon, Schensch is atleast as good as him if not better and 2 SA boys coming home is always good.

Would a line up of

C Schenscher/Johnson
PF Ballinger/Holmes
SF Creek/Cheap import or Hill
SG Magden/Herbert
PG Bruce/Carter

be better than our current line up? IMO it would be, but whether its enough of an improvement to make the playoffs im not sure.

Another option would be to sign say Schenscher for say Holmes and Carter and/or Hill/cheap import wage and combine both import wages and have a crack at say Newley, would say 300k be enough to bring him home? or a proven import like a Ebi Ere, no idea if its enough but would give it a crack and go for a team like

C Schenscher (125k)/Johnson (80k)
PF Ballinger (150k)/Dowdell or Holmes (30k/min salary, around 50k for Holmes)
SF Magden(85k)/Creek (50k)
SG Newley or best import we can get (300k) /Herbert (50k)
PG Bruce (55k)/Daly and/or Carter (30k/min salary) (keep both and run an 11 man squad if possible)

if those figures are reasonable budgets that gives us enough room in the cap to sign those guys, as obviously i have no idea what players are on it was just my guess to see if a line up like that would be remotely possible.

Obviously if we can get a better aussie and have the cap room slide them in and push out the player required, but i dont know how many top level aussies are available or would be likely to leave their nbl team, as i said i doubt guys like Gibson or Martin would leave, Wortho has re-signed maybe we could have a crack at guys like Wagstaff and Weigh if they are available, but id also imagine they would be tough to get out of Perth.

Reply #307935 | Report this post


BALLER#3  
Years ago

I reckon if you get rid of ballinger your a tool.

I think Ballinger, Johnson, Holmes, Carter, Ng and Creek are keepers.

Import Small Forward that is athletic, and a crowd pleaser.

Import Shooting Guard with 3 point touch.

Get Big Schenscher back because he dominates, and is exactly the player 6ers need.

Keep either Bruce or Daly as back up PG.

Reply #307938 | Report this post


Jonno  
Years ago

Baller#3 i do mostly agree, to throw a couple of names out there as style of players we need as imports would say Dave Thomas be the SF and Farley mould at SG? or more Devries mould? The main difference i had was due to bad luck in import selection (league wide) using Aussies or spending big on 1 player and i had Herbert for Ng, because i think Herbert is a more complete player.

would you go for a team like?

Schenscher/Johnson
Ballinger/Holmes
Dave Thomas mould import/Creek
Farley mould import/Ng
Carter/Bruce

If we get the imports right that could be a good team IMO.

Reply #307942 | Report this post


Peter  
Years ago

Have we improved this year? we've yet to match last season's win-loss record and there is a real chance we will finish 8th again. The return of Sydney may be the only thing to keep us off the bottom. There has been no consistency of effort and performance from week to week. I think 2 wins in a row is the best streak for the season?

Some young players have been allowed to gain experience and that's great for them and *perhaps* for next year's or the year after's 36ers. But, as a follower, improvement has to happen in the W-L column some time. I'm not sure there's been the improvement in what's happening on the court (as opposed to on the training track) to expect a quantum leap in performance next year.

That includes tactically from the coaching panel. How the team starts games each week is mostly about the preparation during the week. Given teh inconsistency of starts this year, teh coaching staff needs to work out where they're going wrong in this area. During games, there often doesn't seem to be any effective plan B.

Reply #307944 | Report this post


EC  
Years ago

I agree Daly and Creek should be retained because as youngsters they are showing great potential and will be an asset in the future. The only problem at present is that Clarke is over using them to make up for the deficiency he has created in the failure to pick up good imports. You cannot have a championship contending team when the rookies are getting the minutes that Creek and Daly have been getting lately. We have not shown any signs of improvement whatsoever with the releasing of Winder and Devries and replacing them with Shannon and Howard. For someone with a 3 year plan, the first year is already a complete failure. Does that mean he still needs another 3 years? By complete failure, I mean he has made no progress on the past year as far as a successful bid for playoffs goes. Like some have already mentioned on this forum that Ballinger is a liability, I have been thinking for the last 2 seasons. Yes, I have noticed that he is at his worst on the road. This is the time that team needs to come strong with strong leadership. He fails competely in that. I have seen no leadership qualities in him at all. He is not the go to guy. In fact the team doesn't have one and he should have been it. He has had some great games, but he is not a consistent leader. Just compare him to Maher. Not that anyone expects another Maher quality captain but the difference is enormous.

Reply #307948 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

Got to include Ng and Hill in your mock teams for 2012 given their dads own the team. I rate both so not saying they don't deserve their spots but just reckon will be more realistic if both are included in the projected team.

Reply #307949 | Report this post


Big Ads  
Years ago

I don't necessarily believe you need two centres, especially not in the NBL. One starting centre who is aggresive on the defensive boards, set strong picks, and push opposition big men off the block are diamonds. Neither Schenscher or Johnson provide these skill sets.

Reply #307956 | Report this post


Beantown  
Years ago

Jonno, I like your first lineup. I've had enough of second rate imports. Give me Schenscher instead of an import any day. In a perfect world I'd prefer someone more athletic like Majok or Khazzouh, but Big Red is a local and would provide the solid presence in the middle we need. The only risk going with Schenscher is that he could easily nick off to Europe. I'd like to think that if we offered him an import's wage though he'd be happy enough to settle down here.

BTW its Madgen, not Magden, but I've been pretty impressed with him all season. Would love to see him come home, but I suspect Sydney knows what they have now and it might be hard to get him here without overpaying!

The toughest call with that first lineup is which two PGs you go with. I like both Bruce and Carter, but I really think that Daly could become a very good PG in a couple of years. It would depend a bit on how committed Bruce is to an NBL career in Adelaide. Up to now, he hasn't shown much long-term commitment to either basketball or the Sixers. I think he is more of a true PG than Carter though, who is nevertheless a nice all-around guard. I think in the end I'd keep one or the other and go with Daly as the understudy.

Anon has definitely raised a sticky question with this lineup though, because there is only room for one of Ng and Hill there. I'll be waiting with interest to see what team Marty is able to put together next year. In the meantime, I'm just going to enjoy watching what the young guys can bring for the remainder of the season.

Reply #307971 | Report this post


Dazzman  
Years ago

Ok so while we're all trying to come up with a roster that will hopefully contest next seasons playoffs, i thought i'd give it a crack.

Luke Schenscher/Jeremiah Trueman
Adam Ballinger/Jacob Holmes
Brad Hill/Mitchell Creek/Nathan Herbert
Aaron Bruce/Rhys Carter/Tom Daly
Kevin Lisch (or like)/Ben Madgen

This is working off a full 12 man roster. Not sure how it would pan out but this is the line-up i'd be looking for. No point changing the entire side but worthwhile to upgrade in a few important area that would make the world of difference i feel.

Reply #307977 | Report this post


Jonno  
Years ago

The more i think about it, i think Ninnis's first team was on the right track being

C Schenscher/Cooper
PF Ballinger/Holmes
SF Grizzard (Hodge/Tyndale)/Hill
SG Maher/Winitana
PG Bruce/Davidson/Kersten

Obviously in the ideal world we would have retained the core of that squad, with Ballinger naturalised, and replaced Maher with a import, and get a good import in Grizzards spot, as when Hodge was in and playing well and Maher was healthy that team was looking very dangerous, and was the last 36es team to make the playoffs.

So ideally i think they would have loved to have something along the lines of

C Schenscher/Cooper
PF Ballinger/Holmes
SF IMPORT/Hill
SG IMPORT/Herbert or Ng
PG Bruce/Davidson or a young pg or run Ng/import sg here

I think a good option would be to build something similar to that next season, obviously Davidson and Cooper have retired, but i would be using that as a model and aiming for something along the lines of, given i think Ballinger, Johnson and Creek are all signed for next season

C Schenscher (125k)/Johnson (80k)
PF Ballinger (150k)/Holmes (50k)
SF import (Tremmell Darden to use a modernish name) or Magden (100k)/Creek (55k)
SG Newley or stud import (Ebi Ere to use a name)(250k)/Herbert or Carter(50k)
PG Bruce(60k)/Daly or Carter(50k)

given my guestimates of salary something along those lines should be acheivable under the cap. Obviously we sign our starters first and bench second and if w dont have say enough to keep Holmes or Herbert/Carter we would have to replace with someone cheaper.

Yes we are possibly overpaying Magden in my guestimates, but unfortunatly i think we will need to if we want him back and getting someone like Darden for 100k might also be a stretch, as from the euro posts he seems to be doing quite well in Europe, but at the end of the day we only need one of these guys, as i have listed them both options in the small fwd spot or we could get both and have one Magden SG and Darden at SF instead of the Newley /stud import spot.

I think the team above would be sort of best case scenario, i think at minimum (aslong as our current players are happy and wanting to return) we should atleast be able to acheive

C Import/Johnson
PF Ballinger/Holmes
SF Creek/Herbert or Hill
SG Import/Carter
PG Bruce/Daly

Which if Creek improves and having him for a full season, our import C can rebound and defend inside, Herbert comes back as good if not better than before, Bruce stays dedicated and has a year atleast as good as his rookie season and plays the full season and our import sg is an improvement on Howard, all of which are acheivable IMO we should improve next season.

Im personally hoping that our roster ends up being in between this one and the more ideal one i listed above.

Reply #307979 | Report this post


Isaac  
Years ago

Dazzman, how does that solve our problems? I think that team would fair about as well as the current team.

Reply #307980 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

I've been waiting for this thread to start as i have been thinking about this for a while.

I believe the 36ers should look for a good basketball model to shape their team around. I believe the San Antonio Spurs is a very good one.

They play more European/Australian style than any other NBA team, and their system helps young guys achieve beyond expectations and potential. Not only that - it doesn't require having an MVP candidate to win. I think the Spurs are a good model to look at.


They have:

C Blair (a big body for defense, not needed to score 16+pts per game)
F Duncan (realise now he isn't getting 20ppg, but he is tall, his jump shot going, and he can get big scores)
F Bowen (know he isn't in the current team, but he was their big Defense guy they could count on. Also made a big contribution by getting open in a specific spot and knocking down 3's)
G Ginboli (big time shooter and can drive to the basket)
G Parker (drives and distributes)
----------
Bench
----------
C Mcdyess (tall guy, does the little things, can work around the basket)
F Bonner (big shooter)
F Jefferson (Athletic slasher)
G Neal (3pt man)
G Hill (good at driving, shooting, distributing)

How does this translate to the 36ers?

Means we have one big offensive guy, another big body down low (import), a driving/distributing guard, a specialist Defense /3pt shooting small forward, a shooting import and a backup 3pt shooter.

C Import/Johnson
F Ballinger/Dowdell
F Herbert/Creek
G Import/Ng
G Bruce/Carter

Bruce/Carter - Distribution
Carter/Herbert - big time Defenders
Import/NG/Herbert - shooters
Ballinger/Import/Johnson - big guys
Creek/Bruce - slashing and driving








Reply #307984 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

Ginobili*

Reply #307985 | Report this post


dud  
Years ago

How does the spurs cap compare to what Adelaide have to offer? I know your not saying that but A guy like Duncan (tall, can shoot, rebound) do not come cheap.

same can be said for shooting guards that can score big.

Reply #307990 | Report this post


Jonno  
Years ago

I like the model on spurs idea, especially if we get the right imports.

Another thought of mine from the start of the season, why didnt we mesh the fleet from HSH guys with the returning 36ers guys, as the fleet had good chemistry and seemed to use Schenscher well and looked pretty good to me, even though HSH wasnt as good as NBL, it would have given us a team like

C Schenscher/Forman (Ballinger play C for the 10 mins Schensch is actually off, Forman play mins at PF)
PF Ballinger/Holmes
SF Herbert (replaced by Creek)/Hill
SG Farley (would have atleast been as good as Howard IMO)/Ng (replaced by Bruce)
PG Troy Jackson (did ok in HSH seemed to be a solid defender and distributor)/Carter/Daly (11th man)

Reply #307991 | Report this post


Dazzman  
Years ago

Isaac here are my ins and outs. Surely these are improvments?

Schenscher v Johnson
Trueman v Dowdell
Lisch v Howard
Madgen v Ng

Maybe Dowdell could hold his spot but Schensch, Lisch and Madgen are all decent upogrades IMO. Isaac i could have just posted a fairytale line-up which everyone would love but unfortunately i doubt that many of the league top players would want to play for the circus that is the Adelaide 36ers ATM. To be honest our ONE HD televised games have not been great and would not be doing us many favours in terms of trying to lure class players to our program.

My two key signings being Schenscher and Lisch would combat our obvious lack of a true centre with size and shot blocking abilities and a genuiene 3-point threat/scorer/game breaker.

Reply #307993 | Report this post


Loco  
Years ago

Clarke goes. End.

Reply #307995 | Report this post


Big Ads  
Years ago

It's late but I can't sleep so I'll join in the fantasy sixer teams game.

C - Baynes(24)/Johnson(22)
PF - Ballinger(31)/Dowdell(22)
SF - Import/Creek(19)
SG - Madgen(25)/Herbert(26)/Ng(28)
PG - Bruce(26)/Carter(26)/Daly(19)

I know I said in an earlier post that you don't need two centres however I see Baynes & Johnson switching between centre and power forward. Baynes will certainly bring muscle but with Ballinger and Dowdell (who can drag defenders out to the 3 point line) the likelihood of Baynes fouling out is less likely.

The import (a Patrick Sanders type with better basketball I.Q) would need to be a scorer and Madgen has shown he can score as the third man on offense. Put Bruce on a year contract as Daly might leap-frog both Bruce and Carter in 12 months given the opportunity.

Defensively Carter, Herbert and Creek, and to a lesser degree Baynes and the import provide defensive intensity.

Question marks would be salary cap (especially with Baynes). On the court I'm imagining the team has more offensive potential as well as youth on its side which could form a nice little balance over say 2-3 seasons together. In terms of defense I'd hope Carter, Creek and Herbert could stifle supply to opposition bigs while Baynes, Ballinger and Dowdell out-muscle their direct opponents. Speed amongst the bigs might be a weakness against athletic front lines.

Comments welcome

Reply #308004 | Report this post


phil  
Years ago

clarke did say the best teams had 2 boomers and 2 good imports and he thought that we were 2 boomers away from being a good team. that at least shows he knows were we are at and ild agree. where in the hell would we get 2 boomers from though?

he seemed to suggest that we would go after an aussie pg? does that mean markovic? im not sure he would leave euro though? he is definately an upgrade on bruce no doubt. i doubt we could steal gibson or martin so i dont think it was aimed at them. could he be refering to delladova is this his final year of college? would have played under marty at some stage i think?

what about the other boomer? he didnt mention anything else who could we sign? or maybe he expects a player on our list like creek to develop to a similar level? maybe target a loughton or something?

in any case i think we all want schensh/ import to team with dj.

balls / backup

creek / import

herbert/ ng

daly/ carter/ markovic.

if we get schensh than one import would be enough just have to be a better one and be capable of playing g/f as we would probably sometimes play 2 pgs on the floor. depending on quality of import that team would be top 3 or 4, and get better as daly, creek and dj do.

maybe wishful thinking but i do hope that he was refering to us getting delly.

Reply #308022 | Report this post


Isaac  
Years ago

Dazzman, I think we missed three things: interior defense, leadership and rebounding intensity. I don't think your upgrades address those things enough. Maybe Lisch a bit with D, and Schenscher will outrebound Johnson, but enough?

Of course, right now we also miss outside shooting with DeVries, Ng and Herbert all gone or injured leaving only Ballinger (who is 29% on the season from long range). We still attempted 19 threes against the Blaze.

After Ng, Holmes is our next best %age from 3P. No one else tops 34%. Carter and Hill are at about 27%.

Reply #308023 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

Dellavedova. problems solved.

Reply #308027 | Report this post


Spinner  
Years ago

Clarke has extended his "3 year plan" to a "10 year plan" and wants to recruit and then develop a team of U/16 Div 2 boys.

Games will now be held at Hillcrest court 2

Reply #308033 | Report this post


Dazzman  
Years ago

Agreed Isaac, but how on earth do we go about recruiting these type of players and prying them away from their successful clubs. We all do our mock line-ups including Schenscher but in reality he will never play for the 36ers again.

The leadership problem was all but solved when Wortho signalled his preference to play in Adelaide mid-season but again we supporters are left to ponder "the one that got away". How or why would we pass up a marquee player of his calibre.

I would rather see John Gilchrist in a sixers uniform than any of the four we've had this season. Eddie's lack of height is often an issue while Howard is too worried about how bad the refs are calling the game.

Isaac i would love nothing more than to see Goulding, Vukona/Petrie or a Matthew Knight in our plans for next season but these are all wishful thinking.

Reply #308041 | Report this post


Isaac  
Years ago

Schenscher could play in Adelaide. Just need to show him respect/interest from the beginning and pay him what he (and his agent) think he's worth. The 36ers actually made him an offer this off-season just been though it wasn't widely reported. Crocs will obviously try to keep him, but I don't think he would get massive interest from across the league as many other teams have their Cs: Knight, Khazzouh, Crosswhite, Wilkinson/Pledger, Davidson, etc.

We could've got Worthington before he went to the Blaze if we cut a signed player and had the money (though if that came between imports, money might've been OK - can't remember timing) but as soon as you do that, you damage chemistry (whatever it's been worth this year) and get a reputation with players that Adelaide desperately need to repair (and have done well at so far).

You can pick these players up, but you have to pay a premium and it won't always be worth it. Someone like Vukona could be a risk. Someone like Khazzouh might be worth overextending to get (Redhage would've been too). Petrie, could go either way.

The other tactic is to buy low - e.g., get an underappreciated benchie to play a bigger role (probably original plan for Johnson), recruit young (Creek) or get unglamorous types (D Martin, Crosswell, Hoare, Herbert, Boucher) with a history on winning teams.

Reply #308047 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

spinner if you have a look at the under 18 div 1 competition the answers could come from there, very good competition at the moment, top 6 teams are very close.

may not be as silly as it sounds

better than recruiting guys from victoria

Reply #308061 | Report this post


Nolan Harcourt  
Years ago

Isaac, agree agree agree with your comments at 308023.

We really need a genuine low post option. Someone that can get the high% shot and box out at the other end. It is very frustrating to watch a team run an offence only to blaze away from the outside and then have nothing on the boards. It must drive Clarke mad.

In truth, the hole that Mark Davis left has never been filled. It has been that long.

Reply #308063 | Report this post


KingJames  
Years ago

Isaac, do you think Schenscher would actually come back and play for Clarke after he choose someone else instead of him?

Reply #308072 | Report this post


phil  
Years ago

wait scratch dellavedova i think he will still be at college next year, am i right?

Reply #308073 | Report this post


XY  
Years ago

Clarke is almost right with the 'two boomers, two good imports' theory (also known as the 'six tall blacks, two good imports' theory).

Looking back over the years, I think it is more of an 'at least three stars, complimentary role players' rule. I think it works for most teams in recent history:

2010 Perth: Redhage, Lisch, D Martin, Cattalini

2009 South: Worthington, Ingles, Donta Smith

2006 & 8 Melbourne: Anstey, D Mac, Thomas

2007 Brisbane: the most stacked team of all time? - Sammy Mac, Ebi Ere, CJ Bruton, Gibson, Rychart

2003-5 Sydney: variously Nielsen, CJ Bruton, Heal, Chris Williams, Jason Smith, Ebi Ere, Kavossey Franklin, Rolan Roberts and several hundred Boomers squad members (Barlow, Kendall etc)

2002 Adelaide: Maher, Farley, ?? - Exception to the rule?

2001 Wollongong: Saville, Charles Thomas, Melvin Thomas

2000 Perth: Rogers, Vlahov, Grace, Fisher, Timmons

98-89/99 Adelaide: Mee, Maher, Brooks

Anyway, the Sixers can really only boast one boomers-level or 'star' player in Ballinger, and otherwise have a team of role players. That just does not cut it. Ballinger's weaknesses are exploited as he does not have other stars to draw the pressure off him or pick up the slack on an off night.

Remember even Khazzouh, the runaway MVP favourite, is on a team with a losing record because he lacks any support at the other positions.

Reply #308074 | Report this post


Isaac  
Years ago

KJ, he's a good guy and could come around if shown the right respect and made to feel like the primary recruiting target, good offer, etc.

I would look at all C options though - spend up on Khazzouh in place of a second or even both imports, etc. This season's shown that you can't easily bank on imports like you could before.

Reply #308079 | Report this post


KingJames  
Years ago

Fair enough Isaac. I hope he does or otherwise another good center would be good also

Reply #308080 | Report this post


Big Marty  
Years ago

Isaac, I think Luke is the man to go for. More because of the fact that Khazzouh won't be leaving Sydney any time soon; not with the clubs "reviving the brand" focus. He's already got Marquee written on him, so he won't go anywhere.

As I've said in posts before; Big Luke and Balls was an awesome combination down low; they had a great PG in Bruce at the time. The let down in their play came near the end when Hodge came in and they weren't the targets anymore.

2nd time round you'll have Creek/Hill whom are 3rd options if any. You could run a Daly/Carter backcourt or Bruce/Carter backcourt and still have a mean team.

My preference would be to have Ng start for a change (he picked up a bit this year) but either way, the 2012 potential team versus the 2008 lineup has a few improvements.

Reply #308081 | Report this post


Isaac  
Years ago

If Sydney are not spending big on their team, they could lose a bidding war?

Reply #308086 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

I wouldn't even waste any offseason recruiting time trying get Khazzouh.

Re-sign Ballinger, give Schenscher whatever he wants (even if it means only one import or even none) and build a team around those two.

Reply #308094 | Report this post


SRT070  
Years ago

Im with Anon, Schencher would be my highest priority if i was clark

Reply #308096 | Report this post


SRT070  
Years ago

lets just hope marty isnt too stubborn to do that

Reply #308097 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

Really? We weren't any good when we had Ballinger and Schencher, with Bruce last time. And if we are starting Hill or Ng, we are not a playoff team.

We need to recruit better players. Khazzouh should be a priority target.

Reply #308101 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

When we had Balls & Schenscher together we were a playoff team (and haven't been since) plus that team had the whole Julius Hodge distraction/blow up, Scott Ninnis as coach and a role player like Aaron Bruce taking up a decent chunk of the salary cap.

I don't think Clarke's up to it but there would be next to no chance they sack him so sign the Big 2 and then build a roster around them.

Reply #308105 | Report this post


Jonno  
Years ago

exactly a Bruce, Ballinger, Schenscher combo with 2 good players at sg and sf ala imports or a rotation of aussies like Magden, Weigh if we can get him, Herbert and Creek, and we will be ok imo.

I agree first priority is to get Schenscher,

my 2nd point of call would be to some one like Newley or Ingles and see of $250-300k is enough to get one of them home, atleast call and see if they are sick of Europe, highly unlikely but make the call.

next is Magden offer him 60-80% of a import wage, if we miss out on a Newley or Ingles type, and still offer him what we can afford and a starting spot if we do get lucky with Newley/Ingles which is highly likely, lets get the best SA boy outside the 36ers in a 36ers uniform.

re-sign Bruce, (make sure its not too expenseve 50-80k, assuming 1,000,000 cap)get the trio of Bruce, Schenscher and Ballinger going again.

If successfull that gives us a good starting point of

C Schenscher
PF Ballinger
SF Newley/Ingles (dreaming i know) or Import or someone like Weigh or Harvey (offer import wages)
SG Magden
PG Bruce

That gives us 3 boomer level talents in Schensch/Balls/Newley or Weigh (similar level Aussie) or import

And 2 good young players with Bruce also having been a Boomer and played at a WC's but i wouldnt call him a legit boomer atm as he needs to have another season as good if not better than his rookie year, and build from their.

Then obviously Creek and Johnson are signed, so we would have 3 spots left, sign 3 out of Daly, Hill, Holmes, Carter, Herbert, Ng and Dowdell, depending on who fits bets in rotations, salary and points.

But make sure we have our starting 5 set first before any of these are signed as we MUST get our starting 5 set before we offer any of those guys contracts and they just get the left over money/points.


Reply #308107 | Report this post


EC  
Years ago

Spinner, at $25 per game they wont need a bigger venue than Hillcrest.

Reply #308109 | Report this post


skull  
Years ago

the other reason big luke might be ready to move back south is cyclone yasi.

the big fella's knees would have been knocking together!!

i'd be planting the seed about now,if i was clarke.



Reply #308111 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

my 2nd point of call would be to some one like Newley or Ingles and see of $250-300k

So ignore NBL rules and the salary cap?

Reply #308112 | Report this post


EC  
Years ago

If you make too many changes to the roster, then you have lost the 1st year of a 3 year plan. You are forced to start all over again. Recruiting players that are doing well in other teams does not necessarily mean they will do well here. Coaches have a lot to do with how players perform and what they develop into. You have coaches like Clarke who specialises in juniors but you have coaches like Goorjian who takes seasoned professionals up another level. You spend a lot of money on Worthington/Schenscher/Khazzouh/Redhage and likes of those players and yet it doesn't guarantee they will make Adelaide successful. I don't think its a case of not having the right roster, its a case of what you make out of it.

Reply #308113 | Report this post


Jonno  
Years ago

I think we could spend 300k on Newley/Ingles or the best player we can get, obviously spend less for a lower quality player, unless there is a max salary rule, and still be able to fit under the cap

Something like

C Schenscher (125k)
PF Ballinger (150k)
SF Newley (300k)
SG Magden (90k)
PG Bruce (70k)

Takes up 735k

leaving 265k for the bench, if you have 2 min salary guys (30k each) you have 3 spots for 205k which is 68k each, should be able to sign 3 decent back ups out of Say Johnson and Creek are 2 of them and are combined on about 136 k, it just leaves one of Holmes, Herbert, Hill, Carter, Daly, Ng, Dowdell, Harris for 68k (or less) as they wont exactly be in high demand else where and possibly even get 3 of them as 2 may take min salary.

Maybe my guesstimates of starter salaries are low, but given the 1,000,000 cap thats sort of how i would budget for each position/player

Reply #308123 | Report this post


Sixersfan  
Years ago

definately think we need a Import big man preferably a centre or go after Schenscher. And another import at small forward/pf.
Push holmes down to small forward with Hill and Creek.
Keep our aussie point guard line-up.

Do not release or even think about getting rid of Ballinger, hes been one of our top contributors for the last few years and is our heart and soul of the team, built around him, Creek, Daly and couple of others.

Johnson is as soft as butter 7 footer and plays like a wanna be sf.

Reply #308125 | Report this post


Big Ads  
Years ago

The same two names seem to be popping up but are there not other Australian centres not currently playing in the NBL that could be lured back next year if offered the right incentive.

I think I'm correct in saying that neither Khazzouh or Schenscher wore Boomer singlets in the past two years and Schenscher gets pushed about to easily against strong inside players. We saw it happen in his last stint as a sixer and it was frustrating to watch physical players have their way with him.

There are guys like Nevill, Maric, Jawal, Baynes, Ogilvy running around Europe that could provide just as valuable to the team at a similar cost. Clarke has links with them all and they could all be valuable in their own way.

One of the biggest frustrations I have had with the sixer squads over the past 4-5 years is the lack of a physical intimidator in the post who isn't afraid to be physical. We have Dowdell partly playing that role, give him a bigger more imposing running mate.

Reply #308127 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

Last time I checked the salary cap rules there was a max per season you were allowed to spend on a player.

Reply #308135 | Report this post


Anonymous  
Years ago

"We saw it happen in his last stint as a sixer and it was frustrating to watch physical players have their way with him."

Actually Schenscher basically dominated two seasons ago with us, check out some of these games he had with us:

25pts, 10reb, 2blk vs Tigers (Chris Anstey)

33pts, 20reb vs Wildcats

19pts, 18reb, 3blk vs Spirit (Khazzouh)

16pts, 17reb, 4blk, 4ast vs Spirit (Khazzouh)

17pts, 22reb, 2blk vs Tigers (Anstey)

19pts, 12reb, 3ast vs Crocs

22pts, 11reb, 4ast vs Wildcats

21pts, 15reb, 4blk, 2stl vs Tigers (Anstey)

25pts, 13reb vs Hawks

24pts, 16reb, 2blk vs Taipans

37pts, 15reb, 3ast vs Hawks

That season with us Schenscher averaged 17ppg @ 55%, 11rpg and 1.4bpg.

Chris Anstey aside from being throughly outplayed by Schenscher in all three games that season was considered the best big man in the league and he averaged 19ppg @ 43% (25% 3pts), 10rpg, 1.7bpg and 1.4spg that season.



Reply #308141 | Report this post


Big Marty  
Years ago

Anon 308101, As already stated, the Sixers were finals contenders when Schensher was around last. We only dipped out on the making the finals that year because Cairns won their last game of the season, as did we. Cairns had to lose for us to get in.

As for the Newley/Ingles call; you're practically dumping two Small Forwards already in Hill and Creek putting them there. You'd be better off having either person fill the 2-spot and keep either Hill or Creek.

A quality big is all that is really needed here. If the "right" kind of respect is required to bring someone like Luke back to Adelaide, just present the following dot points:

* Last attempt at the finals was while he was playing.
* Immediately leaves Adelaide and joins a Championship side.
* Leaves Perth and joins another Finals contender team.
* Adelaide have worst season in History following departure.
* Best player on Adelaide squad is now reduced to being the target of "liability" posts on this forum.

AKA; the club has turned to sh*te since he left.

And while Lukes departure from the club didn't necessarily trigger any of those events; it's still worth pointing them out anyway.

Reply #308145 | Report this post


Isaac  
Years ago

Anon and Jonno, I think Ingles might be on closer to $1m than that.

Reply #308147 | Report this post


phil  
Years ago

schensh played his best ball with the sixers.

ingles is at the best club outside the nba. and he is doing well and at what 23 im guessing is a baby in ball terms. would not come home. wouldnt have a shot at newley either. unfortunately we wont see them for a while but i hope when they are 30 and getting year by year offers from euro we offer them a good deal and see them home. cant see jawai yet either. ogilivy is smashing it in turkey, big centre who can regularly score a double double will always have a good euro offer.

baynes is the one im not sure about? dont know much about him. basically look at nevill, he is decent but far from a star but half decent big boys will get good euro money.

to be honest ild take photos of adelaides beaches and city to lithuania and target a few of their boys. 7footers are more common than dodgy polititians over there. grab a couple of kids who have promise but are outside of their national programs and offer them a chance to play ball here. not every kid in lithuania will head to US college and will be fighting for spots on local teams.

honestly they would have 80 7ft centres for every 20 pgs trying out for teams, we could offer them a good city, good league and the chance to maybe later naturalise and compete against 5 or so good aussie centres for national team duties.

Reply #308156 | Report this post


Jonno  
Years ago

Oh yea, as i said highly unlikely re someone like Newley or Ingles, same goes for guys like Baynes and Ogilvy, i doubt we will be seeing any of the young boomers like them in Aus any time soon, but id atleast make the quick call, as you never know if you dont ask.

Assuming we dont get aither of them go for guys like Weigh and Harvey or a import along with targeting Magden and retaining Creek and one of Herbert, Hill, Ng in the sg/sf rotation

Reply #308203 | Report this post




You need to be a registered user to post from this location. Register here.



Close ads
Little Streaks - The fun and interactive good-habits app designed especially for kids.
Serio: Tourism photography and videography

Advertise on Hoops to a very focused, local and sports-keen audience. Email for rates and options.

Recent Posts



.


An Australian basketball forum covering NBL, WNBL, ABL, Juniors plus NBA, WNBA, NZ, Europe, etc | Forum time is: 4:24 am, Thu 28 Nov 2024 | Posts: 968,026 | Last 7 days: 754