Anon, are you sure they've got a naming rights sponsor?
Winder was playing in the D-League for chicken feed.
He was playing in Syria.
DeVries isn't an expensive import by any stretch.
Said to be more expensive than Lisch (and I imagine he'd be more than Gruber, Davison, perhaps Rychart, more than Rickert would've been, probably more than Devendorf and so on). I don't think there are many "expensive imports" in the league any more.
Will leave the rest because the difference between what someone thinks is cheap and what's pretty average in the league may not be much.
No, unlike some I don't have an angle or vested interest in any of this I just think last season's roster was a bit insulting (stuff like signing Cortez and refusing to cut him, something you and many others wouldn't have gone quiet about under previous owners including Boti) and this season it's shaping up as much the same thing.
I thought (and said) that Groves should've been replaced. I wondered if he wasn't because I assumed he was cheap. He (bizarrely) wasn't cheap, I learnt after the season. I said the same about replacing Chappell and about Tyndale (36ers were my client the whole time).
Last year, they got close to breaking even but didn't profit. Whether you think "can't see how they wouldn't have profited" is irrelevant I guess.
There was other interest (as there always is - remember Ron Basset?), but how many stepped up to pay for it? No one else. Because it was a risk. If they can make it work, great. If you don't like the perception of a cheap team (whether it's true or not), you can (as I'm sure you do) vote with your wallet or contact the club to express your feelings.
Every time they've overspent and fallen into a dangerous situation (post-BASA, post-Hemmerling) it's made it much harder to recruit a team. Players who might've played for $x0k on a contender might demand $1x0k to move to an unstable club.