Anonymous
Years ago
National Junior Champs - Is change needed?
For most people who have attended a Nationals the battle is regularly for 2nd. The Vics (normally Vic Metro) having 1st place locked up.
This is further supported by performances at Junior Tournaments such as Eltham Australia Day, Norwood Easter, and National Junior Classics in June.
Last week the ASC produced figures showing basketball was now the biggest sport in Victoria in regards to registered players.
The AFL also has a dominance by Victoria but handle their Junior Tournament differently to basketball.
While basketball doesn't need to go to the extreme of a two-tier competition as it is actually played nationally maybe basketball could learn a lesson from AFL.
While SA and WA are known footy strongholds the AFL still do not break up these states as Metro and Country teams but rather as acutal state teams.
Is there a lesson here to learn for basketball? Should BA make a change to the structure of Junior Nationals and return SA and WA to state teams and not Metro/Country teams?
NSW may be big enough participation wise to remain Country/Meto.
Queensland while not having huge numbers has a pretty even participation from North Queensland all the way south of Brisbane and a single side may be too difficult to manage.
Combining SA Metro and Country would produce a much deeper team that would compete with the Vics at all levels of junior basketball. On the other side it also reduces the opportunities to play at this level.
In my opinion it certainly would make every national a much closer and open contest.