Jack Toft
Years ago
I think you'll find being the public holiday, the boys are enjoying a spot of fishing
Harry Hopeless
Years ago
I promise to spit on you I Carumba. Shouldn't make that because I can't keep it. I have no idea who you are in the same way you have no idea who I am.
Then again I wouldn't waste my spittle on you anyway
Harry grow up.
Today was always going to be a public holiday and it would have been simple for BSA to list the date as tomorrow and not the 26th.
Another example of laziness from that office.
Gazza
Years ago
Yeah, Laziness;
They couldn't be bothered putting the correct date up, the extra effort to type the 7 instead of the 6 was waaaaay too much.
Of course it's oversight.
The Banker
Years ago
Is it really big deal? The answer is no
Why dont you all just be paitent like everyone else
If you want to keep complaining about it then why dont u put your hand up and volunteer to help out around the Basketball SA office
One day is not the end of the world and as I live with my own mistakes daily, cut them some slack.
Jack Toft
Years ago
BSA have not done a bad job for a change. Like everything, some of the rankings are a bit up for grabs, but generally OK.
Interesting to see how much perceived bias there will be with the draws. ie Home teams playing out of home stadiums. Would be good to see it mixed up a bit, but I expect a lot of Eagles teams will play all their games at Wayville and likewise with Sturt at Pasadena.
BTW is the Dome getting used this year?
I don't mind if they do play at home but let's at least mix up the refs and have Pasadena say based at morphett vale etc etc
How could BSA rank the Mount Gambier team number 1 in the Under 16 Girls. This now has the 3 of the top 4 SA Distrit team in the one pool.
The U 16 girls is not a strong group this year so the seeding of Mount Gambier one,is not unreasonable.
Jack Toft
Years ago
It's a shame there are not more country teams in the mix to make it a true state champs.
It is unreasonable to seed any team on assumptions and heresay and basically give them a free ticket to the Classics
I thought F/ville, Eastern and Sturt had nominated!!!
True those three teams have nominated and your point is?
Jesus Shuttlesworth
Years ago
Where do you find the seeding information ?
I always say you're working well when you have to explain your lame jokes...
Demios
Years ago
Mt. Gambier Ranked 1. Common, when was the last time a country team was good enough to go to classics? Ever. Bet making this helps some and hinders others! How can you make this sort of assumption with any credibility. Forstville will clean them up easy, Sturt too I would think. Both teams have multiple State players one would think.
The number of state players from two clubs underlines the average standard of this present U16 group who don't compare favorably with past seasons thus supporting the seeding of the country team. Some fair judges have seeded Mt Gambier first so let's wait and see.
What has this Mt Gambier team done to deserve the number 1 ranking and force the three of the top 4 Metro sides into one side of the pool?
My bet is the Top 4 Metro sides would clean them up yet we wont know as they have been handed the top seed and only play one of the top 4 sides to make the Semi Finals.
Why did norwood nit enter any teams in under twenty mens
There are rules for players moving between State and Reserve competition but what rules exist in Reserves competition where there are two teams from one club nominated for the teams to be switched to get the strongest team in the easier pool. I can see a couple of obvious examples where this may be a temptation.
Another ? - How many U20 ABA / Div 2 players will be slotted back into U20 teams and Div 1 players moving into Div 2???
Dione 90
Years ago
Surely if this is the STATE CHAMPIONSHIPS all teams should be able to put their best group on the floor.
Otherwise it would not be a useful competition. Just another weekend of games. The weekly comp is for improving and this tournament is for performing.
If it was a real State Championship, it would be 1 grade, open to anyone who wanted to enter. Metro, Country, Social, etc.
it is about time you city folk start accepting the fact that country kids can play the game just as good if not better than you. Mount gambier most deservedly are ranked no 1 in U16 girls. i saw them play in Adelaide in country champs and won the final by 40points. what i reckon you should be grateful for is i believe a couple of them play in the district comp and will not play for this team in the champs, cause if they had there full team the rest of us might be a little embarrased by there abilities. looking around the u/16 comp most teams have at least 1 or 2 country kids in there best 6 or 7 anyway. it is thew state championships let them all play, and lets see who is the best.
lo 59
Years ago
anon,
Sturt and Forestville dont have country players, and they are clearly in front of everyone else.
Mavs have 4 or 5 country kids and are about 20 poins off the pace.
Jack Toft
Years ago
It's a long way to come from Mt Gambier every weekend to play ball!
Who do these girls play for?
The problem with a lot of country association teams is the lack of game practice as a team. Some associations chuck a group of players together a couple of weeks before a carnival, get a parent to coach and go for it. Others, have a pretty good programme. MG are one of those associations.
Every so often people whinge and complain about Victorian teams being taller, better etc. That is because they have a larger talent pool to draw from. Each District club has a pool of about 100,000 population to draw from and there is around 300 to 400,000 people in SA living in rural areas.
I would suggest that if those country areas were split into 3 or 4 zones of roughly 100,000 population and then the best players from living in those areas played for that team, then some of those teams would cream any Adelaide club team (without their country players)
For example, I would suggest that a combined team selected from the talents of Pt Lincoln, Whyalla, Roxby, Pt Augusta and Pt Pirie (around 100,000 population) would wipe and Adelaide team off the court.
Charon 58
Years ago
Great, lets take that philosophy to Nationals. We should be able to combine metro into 4 clubs and clean up.
Club size is not determined by population, but rather by administration ability. Some country associaitons are the same size as metro clubs, if not bigger.
Maybe the metor clubs should be allowed to combine for U14 Nationals?
observer
Years ago
I believe any club team country or metro should play in state champs, it would be great to play against different people instead of the regulars, but i also believe that the SA country association don't contribute financially to BSA so why should they compete in an association they don't support?
Heres a thought why don't i make up my own team and throw it in the champs and see how it goes!!
Now i am being silly but what is stopping someone from doing that, get a few disgruntled people from random clubs find a coach and you could almost put together a state team!
Imagine if someone did that for the 14's Nationals
Food for thought
I think maybe you are all getting carried away because Sturt U12 boys would cane this average year level of girls which includes the country lasses. Let Mt Gambier compete without the nonsense and prove the rankings wrong on the court .
Charon 58
Years ago
That sfine, but it effects the seedings for classics and they should occupy the next postion which would drastically alter the pools and affect some teams rather than others.
Wonder which club is affected the most and which the least?
What's it matter?
Win the thing and get the call up to Classics, dont come anywhere and dont go anywhere...
mavs are not 20 popints off, they beat forestville the other week, regardless off people missing like Jess Trimbole, she is going to be missing for a very long time
You need to be a registered user to post from this location. Register here.
Advertise on Hoops to a very focused, local and sports-keen audience. Email for rates and options.
Recent Posts
- Updated every 15 minutes
-
Dog 55,
Sun 21:44 - re: WNBL Round 4 -
Weedy Slug,
Sun 20:37 - re: WNBL Round 4 -
Dog 55,
Sun 20:19 - re: WNBL Round 4 -
The Phantom ,
Sun 19:36 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Maybe,
Sun 19:27 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24 -
QuokkaWoylie,
Sun 19:27 - re: WNBL Round 4 -
Weedy Slug,
Sun 18:42 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24 -
Scout,
Sun 18:26 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
bazza99,
Sun 18:19 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24 -
Luuuc,
Sun 18:16 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24 -
Anon,
Sun 18:16 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24 -
Perthworld,
Sun 18:15 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24 -
JMS,
Sun 18:12 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24 -
Luuuc,
Sun 18:06 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24 -
bazza99,
Sun 18:02 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24 -
Frogmanbaby,
Sun 17:58 - re: Boomers @ Korea, Nov 24 -
Cool Howie,
Sun 16:13 - re: WNBL Round 4 -
Luuuc,
Sun 14:30 - re: WNBL Round 4 -
Dog 55,
Sun 14:15 - re: WNBL Round 4 -
Luuuc,
Sun 13:56 - re: WNBL Round 4 -
Knockdown3,
Sun 13:11 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Sun 13:07 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Luuuc,
Sun 12:49 - re: WNBL Round 4 -
LV,
Sun 12:34 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Sun 12:32 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Knockdown3,
Sun 12:19 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Dunkman,
Sun 12:13 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Knockdown3,
Sun 12:06 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Sun 11:58 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Knockdown3,
Sun 11:37 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Perthworld,
Sun 11:34 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LaPark,
Sun 11:27 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Q Anon,
Sun 11:04 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
AusLoco,
Sun 11:00 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Q Anon,
Sun 10:59 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Sun 10:39 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
KET,
Sun 10:15 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Sun 10:06 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Sun 10:04 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
KET,
Sun 9:58 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Sun 9:51 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Sun 9:45 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
KET,
Sun 9:29 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Scout,
Sun 8:57 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Sun 8:40 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
LV,
Sun 8:40 - re: Melbourne v Adelaide 2.3... -
Perthworld,
Sun 1:10 - re: WNBL Round 4 -
Perthworld,
Sun 1:08 - re: youtuber with aussie nba... -
Naph,
Sun 0:47 - re: youtuber with aussie nba... -
QuokkaWoylie,
Sun 0:23 - re: WNBL Round 4
An Australian basketball forum covering NBL, WNBL, ABL, Juniors plus NBA, WNBA, NZ, Europe, etc | Forum time is: 12:38 am, Mon 25 Nov 2024 | Posts: 968,026 | Last 7 days: 754