Skud - I'll take a little nibble...
Firstly, I am an unabashed supporter of Australian home grown basketball talent, and I believe the vast majority of my thread replies support this. Therefore I make no apolopies in supporting a young Australian player over any import.
There is a big difference between an import and a young Australian player in the NBL. An import is brought in, generally paid a lot more money, and is expected to perform game in game out. And whilst we would obviously love to see this in our homegrown talent also, history shows imports have been and will continue to be judged a lot more critically than a local player whether you like it or not. Personally, I would rather see an import moved on rather than an Australian.
There are clearly arguments for an against the retention of Brad Hill. I merely suggested the statement made by the first anonymous post was a bit harsh.
Brad Hill played under Goorjian the previous season with the Dragons and was a lot more consistent in his performances and was beginning to lift the lid on his potential. IMO, moving back to Adelaide to play under Ninnis appears to have set his progress back a step or two. Is it the team? Is it the player? Or perhaps, is it the coach? Maybe a combination of all three...
I believe Brad Hill may yet realise his potential and is still likely to be a very good player in the NBL. Whether that is at Adelaide or not is yet to be determined.