Mystro, 24 shots in 25 minutes suggests he was the focus when he was on. Next most shots were taken by Ballinger and Grizzard with 12 each (and the equal 2nd highest scorers). NZ's most prolific shooter was Penney with 14 shots and he was certainly a focus for them. So I conclude Hill was definitely the focus when he was on, for Adelaide's offence.
Adelaide's problem wasn't with scoring. We took plenty of shots, hit them at a healthy rate (45%) and got a decent number of foul shots, which we didn;t shoot so well but okay (64%).
Aside from the second quarter, our problem was with stopping NZ from scoring. As has been the case for 6 years, Adelaide could not perimeter defend a team with good outside shooters. I watched Bruton and Black dismantle Adelaide at the Powerhouse in successive years for big wins to Brisbane. I watched Bruton and Smith dismantle Adelaide at the Powerhouse for the Sydney Kings. Hell, I even saw Paul Henare carve us up for a half one night when we nearly lost to the Breakers - just because he could penetrate past our guards so easily.
Given defence again seemed to be our big problem last night, was this a consideration in the amount of time Hill was on the floor? How did the NZ players he guarded go? I am only going by box scores so don't know whom he guarded during the game.