Someone please explain this. I am waiting for someone to give a perfectly logical explanation of this situation that will exclude coach involvement.
I'll give this a shot.
We're 5-9. Four teams above us have won either five or six games - it's a competitive season and any deficiency is punished. If we'd won against any of Cairns (one point loss), Sydney (two point loss) or Dragons (six point loss in the end), we'd be in the top six. If two had gone our way, we'd be top five.
Consider Maher's winding down, Bruce is still very young, and Hodge is only a recent inclusion, we're realistically a top five team, but not necessarily higher than top three unless everything comes together perfectly.
A couple of losses stand out as being influenced by the roster available at the time: to New Zealand without Ballinger and Bruce (wouldn't have won, but should've been closer), to the Wildcats by 12 without Ballinger, and to Cairns without Maher or Davidson (meaning that a rookie was running our team for over 39 minutes against a defensive champion in Mee).
You could also add Saturday night to that list. We'd taken the lead and then one of our best two players is taken out of the game by cramp.
In a few games (not sure if it would've changed the result or not), we were also effectively carrying Tyndale.
The losses that I think are a little less excusable were against the Spirit (either time) or the Hawks, but these are both teams that do not give in and have proved troublesome in the past (we lost in Wollongong with Julius last year). I reckon we'll finish the season above both of them, FWIW.
I don't think the players and coaches would be overjoyed with a few of the results this season, but we're not that far off where we should be - second-last sounds very mediocre, but the glass-half-full equivalent is that we're a two-point Spirit game (basically, a Bruce turnover I think someone said?) outside of the top six.