Black Dracula
Years ago
Basketball in Australia - no stars = no visibility
Simply put, my theory is this:
Basketball in Australia has no one with a high enough public profile to endorse the sport as a top-tier competition in Australia.
Since the retirement of Andrew Gaze, there hasn't been anyone synonymous with basketball in this country. Combine this with a lack of household names in the NBA, this reduces the overall visibility of basketball to the Australian public.
My reasoning is like this: during the mid 90s, Michael Jordan was coming to the twilight in his career but was still the face of basketball, globally. Locally, Andrew Gaze was one of Australia's best locally produced players and was media friendly enough to put a face on Australian basketball and the NBL. The flow on of interest in Michael Jordan and the NBA down to NBL would not have been trivial; fans of the American league may be interested to see local product.
In 2008, there is no real household names as far as the NBL or NBA are concerned. People may know Andrew Bogut was a #1 pick but there's not much he can do when he's playing 82 games a year in the USA.
The Boomers play too infrequently for anyone to care. When they do, there's little publicity. No one apart from basketball fans knows that Matt Nielson and David Andersen are back from Europe to play for Australia. The media, if they mention anything, give most reference to Bogut.
Does anyone agree/disagree with this? if agree, is there anything that can be done? will a reform of Basketball in Australia be enough, indeed can it even be enough?