Bo Hamburger
Years ago
Is basketball only interesting in last 2 mins?
It's Friday, and time for a discussion if others are up for it: one of the knocks on basketball is that it's supposedly only interesting in the last 2 minutes of a game (assuming the game is close).
The argument, I'm guessing, that supports this theory goes along the lines of: basketball is so up-and-down the floor, and the scoring so frequent and regular, that nothing of consequence occurs until late in the game.
Does this argument have some validity? Could we even be talking about a paradox: are the last 2 minutes, while supposedly the most interesting, also the dullest due to the stop-start nature (ie timeouts, deliberate fouling, lots of foul shots, etc)? How can this stop-start stuff be eradicated/improved?
Discuss, in 25 personal insults or less.